The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

logo

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
Advanced Search
CanadaEnergy SubsidiesEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsFinance & InvestmentJobs & TrainingOil & GasOpinion & AnalysisTar Sands/Oil SandsUnited States
Home›Jurisdictions›Canada›Canadian Fossils Headed for ‘Deep, Deep Collapse’ After Oil Price Dips to -$37.63 Per Barrel

Canadian Fossils Headed for ‘Deep, Deep Collapse’ After Oil Price Dips to -$37.63 Per Barrel

Opinion & Analysis

April 22, 2020
April 22, 2020
 
Primary Author Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer
181
2
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A1_Houston_Office_Oil_Traders_on_Monday.jpgWikipedia

Oil traders and fossil executives whose livelihoods rise and fall on the price of oil were in a state of collective shock earlier this week, as plummeting demand due to the coronavirus pandemic drove ricocheting prices well below zero for the first time ever.

“Of all the wild, unprecedented swings in financial markets since the coronavirus pandemic broke out, none has been more jaw-dropping than Monday’s collapse in a key segment of U.S. oil trading,” Bloomberg reported earlier this week. “The price on the futures contract for West Texas (WTI) crude that is due to expire Tuesday fell into negative territory—minus US$37.63 a barrel.

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

“That’s right, sellers were actually paying buyers to take the stuff off their hands.,” the news agency continued. “The reason: with the pandemic bringing the economy to a standstill, there is so much unused oil sloshing around that American [fossil] energy companies have run out of room to store it. And if there’s no place to put the oil, no one wants a crude contract that is about to come due.”

Reuters had the price for WTI bottoming out at -US$40.32 before bouncing back slightly. Brent Crude, the European benchmark price, was down $2.51, to US$25.57 per barrel.

“I understand the price of West Texas Intermediate is at -$37.63,” snarked a friend of The Energy Mix, who asked not to be identified by name. “I’d like to order one billion barrels, please. Below is my bank account for deposit of the $37,630,000,000.00 as my rebate for buying this stuff.”

But there was actually a less entertaining explanation for what’s going on.

Oil prices are constantly shifting up or down, with buyers and sellers negotiating larger contracts weeks in advance based on where they expect the price will land on the day they have to deliver or receive the actual, physical product. It’s a futures contract—that’s why a final price for a barrel of oil in May was locked in April 21, and why the Bloomberg report on Monday had traders setting a contract price of $20.43 for June. The higher price was a measure of how far they expected oil consumption to increase and the storage crunch to ease in the next month—as of Monday, at least.

For decades, any hint of an oil price shock that could limit supply—a natural disaster, the threat or reality of a regional war, or a meeting of the OPEC oil cartel—could drive prices higher.

But now, the market is being roiled by collapsing demand. With pandemic lockdowns driving consumption into freefall, fossils are stashing their surplus anywhere they can, even paying up to $180,000 per day for “floating storage” on colossal, two-million-barrel oil tankers anchored at sea. The massive storage and trading depot in Cushing, Oklahoma is expected to reach its maximum capacity in the next month, The Canadian Press wrote.

“Physical demand for crude has dried up, creating a global supply glut as billions of people stay home to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus,” Reuters explained. “Refiners are processing much less crude than normal, so hundreds of millions of barrels have gushed into storage facilities worldwide. Traders have hired vessels just to anchor them and fill them with the excess oil. A record 160 million barrels is sitting in tankers around the world.”

That means epic losses for anyone who bought oil at a higher price, expecting to sell it for a profit, only to have the short-term or “spot” price of that product collapse before their eyes.

“If you’re a seller and you’re desperate to get rid of the contract, you’re willing to pay somebody to take it off your hands,” Martin King, senior analyst at RBN Energy, told CP. “And if you’re willing to buy the contract, you want to be compensated for what could be enormous risk and not being able to deliver those barrels or store those barrels. So you want to be paid to take that contract.”

“Pricey shut-ins or even bankruptcies could now be cheaper for some operators, instead of paying tens of dollars [per barrel] to get rid of what they produce,” Rystad Energy oil markets analyst Louise Dickson told Reuters.

It all means that “the May crude oil contract is going out not with a whimper, but a primal scream,” said oil historian Daniel Yergin, vice chair of energy analysis firm IHS Markit.

And Michael Tran, managing director of global energy strategy at RBC Capital Markets, saw little chance that anything will change soon. “Refiners are rejecting barrels at a historic pace, and with U.S. storage levels sprinting to the brim, market forces will inflict further pain until either we hit rock bottom, or COVID clears, whichever comes first, but it looks like the former,” he told Bloomberg.

The price collapse had fossils shutting down 13% of their exploration drilling in the last week. On Tuesday, a follow-up report by Bloomberg pointed to the June selling price for oil heading downward, as well. “The collapse of later contracts underscored the severity of the crisis rocking oil in the age of coronavirus,” the news agency said. “Storage tanks, pipelines and tankers are rapidly being overwhelmed by a vast oversupply.”

By Tuesday, the market downturn had Canadian fossils renewing their demands for a C$30-billion government bailout. “It all bodes ill for Canada’s struggling oil and gas industry, which is being injected with $2.45-billion-plus of federal money to save corporations and their work forces from the worst economic effects of the COVID-19 crisis,” the Globe and Mail wrote. “The call for more aid is already growing, three days after the package was announced.”

“Our expectation is that government will continue to evolve their programs as we’ve seen them do for other businesses and citizens,” said Tim McMillan, president and CEO of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. The Toronto Star said CAPP is looking for government guarantees for fossils’ bank loans and “a new credit structure available to all business sizes”.

“Our customers are concerned because they’re selling their oil and gas products right now into markets that are volatile and quite low priced,” Kevin Neveu, CEO of Calgary-based Precision Drilling Corporation, told the Star. “Access to capital is completely turned off. We’re seeing more and more news of companies that are failing and have to restructure their debt. I think we’re sliding down into a deep, deep collapse of the industry right now.”

The Globe and Mail’s Jeffrey Jones agreed. “Negative oil prices may be the talk of global energy markets this week, but corporate red ink and its effects will be around long after the novelty wears off,” he wrote. “The question is how many companies can hold on while that happens and cash flow dries up, even with government support providing a life support for wages, environmental cleanup, and credit guarantees.”

The National Post had several fossil executives complaining that last week’s $2.45-billion federal announcement wasn’t to their liking.

“This is not going to do anything,” said Whitecap Resources CEO Grant Fagerheim. “If this is as good as it gets, it will do very little or nothing to assist with operations for companies.”

“I think they made the calculation that it would be politically unpalatable in Ontario and Quebec to provide direct supports to oil and gas,” said another fossil exec who declined to be identified.

But “Ottawa has already rolled out a host of programs aimed at aiding private companies, including a cross-economy wage subsidy program expected to cost around $73 billion,” the Post noted. “Firms can also apply for lines of credit through the Business Development Bank of Canada and Export Development Canada. The EDC and BDC on Friday said they would expand their current lending program for oil and gas companies, which currently allows for small loans between $15 and $60 million to cover operating costs.”

But the deeper problem is that there’s no immediate demand for the product, no clear sense of when or to what extent demand will return—and Richard Masson, an executive fellow with the University of Calgary’s fossil-affiliated School of Public Policy, said Canadian producers can’t shut down operations completely without damaging oil reservoirs.

“We’re going to find that we just have no place to put it,” he told the Toronto Star. “So we’re likely to experience negative prices over the next few weeks because it takes time to slow down production, and demand just dropped off a cliff.”

Meanwhile, “should the global freeze on movement stretch into September, things could get ‘very ugly’ in Alberta—mass layoffs, companies shutting down, and conglomeration,” the paper adds, citing Masson.

Even before the oil price went below zero, the unprecedented situation had analysts speculating that previously “untouchable” shareholder dividends from Canada’s biggest, most financially stable fossils might be at risk.

TagsBitumen BubbleBitumen Bubble Finance & Divestmentbyline-internalCanada Net Zero - Climate Impacts
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
CanadaEnergy SubsidiesEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsFinance & InvestmentJobs & TrainingOil & GasOpinion & AnalysisTar Sands/Oil SandsUnited States

    2 comments

    1. David Huntley 23 April, 2020 at 15:17 Reply

      Please can you explain “Canadian producers can’t shut down operations completely without damaging oil reservoirs.” If an operation is shut down the oil will still be there., and available in the future.

      • Mitchell Beer 23 April, 2020 at 18:29 Reply

        Good question, David, thanks, and let me put it out to readers — can anyone clarify?

        It’s a reference I’ve seen a couple of times recently — in Masson’s comment on the price crash, and in the last couple of weeks when Alberta Premier Jason Kenney justified keeping tar sands/oil sands man camps open in spite of the risk of infection. Kenney said it would cost billions of dollars to shut down, then reopen because the geology of the reservoirs would somehow be harmed.

        TBH, we haven’t had a chance to look into it, but it was interesting in last night’s batch of news to see the same point coming from a second source for a different reason. Once again, if anyone can shed light on this, please reply! (I’ll make a note to look into it, too.)

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts

    • EXCLUSIVE: Study Shows Governments’ Oil and Gas Revenue Crashing as Decarbonization Takes Hold
      EXCLUSIVE: Study Shows Governments’ Oil and Gas Revenue Crashing as Decarbonization Takes Hold
      February 12, 2021
    • Countries Must Cut Emissions 80% Beyond Paris Pledges, but Study Author Sees Glimmers of Hope
      Countries Must Cut Emissions 80% Beyond Paris Pledges, but Study Author Sees Glimmers of Hope
      February 12, 2021
    • Fund Low-Income Building Retrofits in Upcoming Budget, Efficiency Canada Urges Ottawa [Sign-Ons]
      Fund Low-Income Building Retrofits in Upcoming Budget, Efficiency Canada Urges Ottawa [Sign-Ons]
      February 12, 2021
    • Big City Mayors Cheer as Trudeau Offers Permanent Federal Transit Funding
      Big City Mayors Cheer as Trudeau Offers Permanent Federal Transit Funding
      February 12, 2021
    • India Was Forewarned About Himalayan Flood Disaster Risks
      India Was Forewarned About Himalayan Flood Disaster Risks
      February 12, 2021

    News Feed

    Top News

    • Enviros Warn California Blackout Prevention Plan Could Drive Up Gas Consumption
      February 11, 2021
    • London Hedge Funds Bet on US$100 Carbon Price
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    Carbon-Free Transition

    • London Hedge Funds Bet on US$100 Carbon Price
      February 11, 2021
    • Smart Cameras on Wind Turbines Cut Eagle Deaths by 82%
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    Canada

    • Alberta Looks to Lithium in Oil Deposits to Stock Electric Vehicle Batteries
      February 11, 2021
    • Students Demand Faster Action After UVic Moves $80 Million to Low-Carbon Investment Fund
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    U.S.

    • Enviros Warn California Blackout Prevention Plan Could Drive Up Gas Consumption
      February 11, 2021
    • U.S. Fossil Utilities Fund Republicans in Georgia Runoff Elections
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    International

    • Students at France’s Elite Universities Want Climate at Heart of Curriculum
      February 11, 2021
    • South Africa Aims to Buy 6,800 MW of Renewables this Year
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Copyright
    Copyright 2020 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.