The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

logo

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
Advanced Search
CanadaEnergy PoliticsEnergy SubsidiesEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsFinance & InvestmentGeneral RenewablesJobs & TrainingOil & GasPipelines/Rail TransportTar Sands/Oil Sands
Home›Jurisdictions›Canada›Time to Cut Fossils’ ‘Corporate Welfare’, Make Economy More Efficient, Author Argues

Time to Cut Fossils’ ‘Corporate Welfare’, Make Economy More Efficient, Author Argues

March 6, 2020
March 6, 2020
 
88
0
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story
Lydia Jacobs/Public Domain Pictures

Eliminating fossil fuel subsidies is a policy measure that could create some common ground between climate campaigners and libertarian free market advocates, self-styled independent journalist and public historian Taylor Noakes writes in a new opinion piece for CBC that had generated more than 3,700 comments as of Thursday evening.

A precise figure for Canadian fossil subsidies is hard to find, Noakes writes, although a 2018 report by the Overseas Development Institute put the total at US$4.73 billion/C$6.3 billion for 2016, the highest per unit of GDP among G7 countries. The International Monetary Fund calculated post-tax fossil subsidies at US$43 billion in 2015-16.

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

“The industry isn’t forthcoming” with the numbers, “but the federal and provincial governments aren’t insisting on accountability either,” he adds. “It’s an unfortunate irony that Canadians in need of public assistance often face more exacting demands on their own accountability than the recipients of corporate welfare.”

But the top-line message still stands: “Eliminating fossil fuel subsidies would obviously help Canada achieve its emissions reduction targets,” he says. “What’s less obvious is how these subsidies undermine our economy, add to the tax burden, and hinder innovation.”

Noakes recalls an argument put forward to a U.S. House of Representatives committee by Véronique de Rugy, senior research fellow with the libertarian Mercatus Center, who listed three reasons to phase out subsidies for all forms of energy: governments have no incentive to manage private investors’ funds; subsidies distort normal investment and economic activity by creating an unfair advantage; and they increase special interests’ lobbying clout, along with their incentive to deploy it.

But even though global fossils have lost $400 billion in market value over the last four years, “the fossil fuel industry in Canada has become so thoroughly politicized that ever-more-generous subsidies are being demanded by companies as the cost of doing business,” he says. “While politicians euphemistically refer to subsidies as ‘investment’ and insist they are facilitating a transition to clean energy, there’s scant evidence this is the case. The entire idea of a ‘transitional fuel’ is absurd: if you burn it for energy, it’s adding to the emissions problem. Worse, according to the International Monetary Fund, subsidies encourage excessive consumption.”

What Noakes calls “inherently inefficient” fossil subsidies also “impede investment in clean energy technologies, ultimately undermining efforts to fight climate change.” By contrast, “eliminating subsidies forces [fossil] energy companies to transition to clean energy more quickly: innovative companies will swim while industry dinosaurs will sink. It’s cold and hard, but that’s the free market for you.”

And “it’s a false dichotomy that Canada must choose between fighting climate change and supporting jobs in Alberta. Both need to happen simultaneously,” he adds. “Rather than pouring money down the hole of the fossil fuel sector, it could be used to retrain unemployed oil workers and build solar arrays, wind turbines, and hydroelectric generating stations, with an aim to providing new jobs in all the regions adversely affected by over-reliance on non-renewable resource extraction.”

Noakes appears to depart from the Mercatus Center’s view that all energy sector supports must disappear. As a single policy measure on its own, getting rid of fossil subsidies won’t deliver the fast, meaningful change Canada’s energy sector needs, he writes, “given the severity of the climate crisis and the increasingly untenable relationship between the fossil fuel industry and Canadian society.” Which means that, “after years of fossil fuel subsidies, government intervention is now necessary to quickly build a clean energy production and distribution infrastructure large enough to get all of Canada off fossil fuels.”

TagsBitumen BubbleBitumen Bubble Finance & DivestmentCanada Net Zero - Federal Policy
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
CanadaEnergy PoliticsEnergy SubsidiesEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsFinance & InvestmentGeneral RenewablesJobs & TrainingOil & GasPipelines/Rail TransportTar Sands/Oil Sands

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts

    • Brutal Cold Snap Triggers Rolling Blackouts, Drives Up Power Costs as Texas Gas Plants Fail
      Brutal Cold Snap Triggers Rolling Blackouts, Drives Up Power Costs as Texas Gas Plants Fail
      February 17, 2021
    • Peg Social Cost of Carbon at $100 Per Tonne, Economists Urge Biden
      Peg Social Cost of Carbon at $100 Per Tonne, Economists Urge Biden
      February 17, 2021
    • Line 3 Pipeline Runs $1.1 Billion Over Budget as Eleventh-Hour Opposition Mounts
      Line 3 Pipeline Runs $1.1 Billion Over Budget as Eleventh-Hour Opposition Mounts
      February 17, 2021
    • Bar Association Resolution Calls for ‘Climate-Conscious Lawyering’
      Bar Association Resolution Calls for ‘Climate-Conscious Lawyering’
      February 17, 2021
    • New Deforestation Map Reveals Shocking Loss of B.C.’s Old Growth Stands
      New Deforestation Map Reveals Shocking Loss of B.C.’s Old Growth Stands
      February 17, 2021

    News Feed

    Top News

    • Trump Environmental Policies Caused 22,000 Deaths, Lancet Study Shows
      February 16, 2021
    • Vista Coal Mine Lays Off 300 in Alberta
      February 16, 2021

    Read More

    Carbon-Free Transition

    • Denmark Approves North Sea Renewable Energy Island
      February 16, 2021
    • Malaysia Turns to Net Metering for 50 MW of Rooftop Solar
      February 16, 2021

    Read More

    Canada

    • Vista Coal Mine Lays Off 300 in Alberta
      February 16, 2021
    • Indigenous Energy Company Gives $1.7M to Northern Ontario Communities
      February 16, 2021

    Read More

    U.S.

    • Trump Environmental Policies Caused 22,000 Deaths, Lancet Study Shows
      February 16, 2021
    • Regulations Could Deal Fatal Blow to Oregon LNG Exports
      February 16, 2021

    Read More

    International

    • Report Calls for Chinese Aluminum Producers to Cut Inefficient Coal Plants
      February 16, 2021
    • Spain Plans to Double Energy Storage Capacity by 2030
      February 16, 2021

    Read More

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Copyright
    Copyright 2020 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.