The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Climate Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • Pipeline Politics
      • COP24
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Podcasts & Webinars
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Partners
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • Climate & Society
    • Carbon-Free Transition
    • Carbon Levels & Measurement
    • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
    • Climate Denial
    • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
    • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
    • Demographics
    • Energy Politics
    • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
    • Energy Subsidies
    • Finance & Investment
    • First Peoples
    • Insurance & Liability
    • International Agencies & Studies
    • Jobs
    • Legal & Regulatory
    • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Methane
    • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
  • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
    • Biodiversity & Habitat
    • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
    • Food Security
    • Forests & Deforestation
    • Health & Safety
    • Heat & Temperature
    • Human Rights & Equity
    • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
    • International Security, Migration & War
    • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Soil & Natural Sequestration
    • Water
  • Demand & Distribution
    • Air & Marine
    • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
    • Batteries/Storage
    • Buildings
    • Cities
    • Electricity Grid
    • Energy Access & Equity
    • Off-Grid
    • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Supply Chains & Consumption
    • Transit
    • Walking & Biking
  • Jurisdictions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • India
    • International
    • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Sub-National Governments
    • United States
  • Non-Renewable Energy
    • CCS & Geoengineering
    • Coal
    • Nuclear
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pipelines/Rail Transport
    • Shale & Fracking
    • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
  • Renewable Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Demand & Efficiency
    • General Renewables
    • Geothermal
    • Hydro
    • Research & Development
    • Solar
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Wind

logo

The Energy Mix

  • Climate & Society
    • Carbon-Free Transition
    • Carbon Levels & Measurement
    • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
    • Climate Denial
    • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
    • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
    • Demographics
    • Energy Politics
    • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
    • Energy Subsidies
    • Finance & Investment
    • First Peoples
    • Insurance & Liability
    • International Agencies & Studies
    • Jobs
    • Legal & Regulatory
    • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Methane
    • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
  • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
    • Biodiversity & Habitat
    • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
    • Food Security
    • Forests & Deforestation
    • Health & Safety
    • Heat & Temperature
    • Human Rights & Equity
    • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
    • International Security, Migration & War
    • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Soil & Natural Sequestration
    • Water
  • Demand & Distribution
    • Air & Marine
    • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
    • Batteries/Storage
    • Buildings
    • Cities
    • Electricity Grid
    • Energy Access & Equity
    • Off-Grid
    • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Supply Chains & Consumption
    • Transit
    • Walking & Biking
  • Jurisdictions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • India
    • International
    • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Sub-National Governments
    • United States
  • Non-Renewable Energy
    • CCS & Geoengineering
    • Coal
    • Nuclear
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pipelines/Rail Transport
    • Shale & Fracking
    • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
  • Renewable Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Demand & Efficiency
    • General Renewables
    • Geothermal
    • Hydro
    • Research & Development
    • Solar
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Wind
Advanced Search
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Climate Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • Pipeline Politics
      • COP24
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Podcasts & Webinars
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Partners
  • Contact
Auto & Alternative VehiclesCarbon Levels & MeasurementClimate & SocietyClimate Impacts & AdaptationDemand & DistributionEnergy PoliticsHealth & SafetyJurisdictionsLegal & RegulatorySub-National GovernmentsUnited States
Home›Demand & Distribution›Auto & Alternative Vehicles›California, 22 Other States Launch Latest Suit Against Trump Fuel Economy Rollback

California, 22 Other States Launch Latest Suit Against Trump Fuel Economy Rollback

November 18, 2019
November 18, 2019
 
25
0
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story
Marzena7/Pixabay

Nearly two dozen U.S. states are taking Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the U.S. Court of Appeals to defend California’s long-standing right to set its own, tougher standards for vehicle fuel efficiency.

“We’ve said it before, and we will say it again: California will not back down when it comes to protecting our people and our environment from preventable pollution,” said Attorney General Xavier Becerra. “No matter how many times the Trump administration attempts to sabotage our environmental progress, we will fight for clean air.”

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

The suit, in which California has the backing of 22 other states, “marks the latest round in an escalating fight between the White House and California officials over how quickly the nation’s auto fleet must increase its fuel efficiency,” the Washington Post reports. “Already, the feud has led to several legal skirmishes, a divided automotive industry, and uncertainty in the nation’s car market.”

The Post traces the dispute back to an exemption under Section 177 of the 1970 Clean Air Act that allows California to set more stringent air pollution standards, and gives other states the option of following California’s lead. “EPA granted the state a waiver to set tailpipe emission standards in 2009, which is the one the agency is trying to pull back.”

EPA spokesperson Molly Black said Trump’s attack on the California standard “will help ensure that there will be one, and only one, set of national fuel economy and greenhouse gas emission standards for vehicles,” making it “clear that federal law pre-empts state and local tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions standards” as well as those for zero-emission vehicles. But the Washington Post cites at least one legal scholar who sees little prospect the White House effort will succeed.

“The Trump administration is on very weak footing in its attempt to revoke the waiver,” said New York University environmental and regulatory law specialist Richard Revesz. Calling the EPA action “unprecedented”, he added that the Act “does not contemplate the possibility that the federal government would revoke a waiver that had already been granted”.

The latest court action comes on the heels of a separate suit that California, 22 other states, and several cities filed against the U.S. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) in September, arguing that the bid to pre-empt California’s tailpipe  emission standards “exceeds NHTSA’s authority, contravenes Congressional intent, and is arbitrary and capricious, and because NHTSA has failed to conduct the analysis required under the National Environmental Policy Act”.

The Post traces the history of the dispute, with the two federal agencies trying to revoke the waiver, and different automakers intervening on both sides of the case. “The episode has exposed a rare policy rift within the automotive industry—one that could pit powerful auto manufacturers industry giants against one another in a protracted legal battle.”

Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
Auto & Alternative VehiclesCarbon Levels & MeasurementClimate & SocietyClimate Impacts & AdaptationDemand & DistributionEnergy PoliticsHealth & SafetyJurisdictionsLegal & RegulatorySub-National GovernmentsUnited States

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Subscribe to The Energy Mix

    The Energy Mix is your guide to climate change and energy issues and solutions. Whether you’re looking for the latest content on the impacts of climate change, the fossil industries that produce the emissions, renewable energy and energy efficiency alternatives, or climate solutions outside energy, you’ve come to the right place. Please send us your comments and story ideas!

    SEE OUR LATEST DIGEST

    Recent Posts

    CanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsCoalElectricity GridInternational Agencies & StudiesMethaneOil & GasShale & FrackingTar Sands/Oil SandsUnited States

    U.S., Canadian Fossils to Lead $1.4 Trillion in New Oil and Gas Development Through 2024

    Fossils in the United States and Canada are leading plans to invest another US$1.4 trillion in new oil and gas extraction projects over the next five years, even though the ...
    • Denmark to Cut Emissions 70% by 2030 While New Zealand Adopts Climate Policy Lens

      Full Story: Climate Home News @ClimateHome

      December 9, 2019
       
      Primary Author Jocelyn Timperley @jloistf
      December 9, 2019
    • Need to Get It Right: Article 6 Could Trigger Faster Carbon Cuts or Massive Greenwashing

      December 9, 2019
       
      Primary Author Mitchell Beer @mitchellbeer
      December 9, 2019
    • Businesses See Climate Action Emerging as Job Creator, Economic Driver: Pittis

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Ottawa Approves Alberta Tax on Industrial Carbon Emitters

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Carbon Pricing ‘Isn’t the Only Tool in the Toolbox’: Wilkinson

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Former Oilpatch Roughneck Traces Hardships of Fossil Employment, Urges Better Deal in Carbon-Free Transition

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Saudi Aramco IPO Shows Weakening Global Oil Market, Perils for ‘Wexit Albertans’

      December 9, 2019
       
      Primary Author Compiled by The Energy Mix staff/ Mitchell Anderson
      December 9, 2019
    • Navajo Coal Plant Closure Opens Door for Solar+Storage, Distributed Power

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Sunrise Colorado Spreads Fake News with Mocked-Up Letter from Denver Mayor’s Office

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Did Kenney Just Link the Moody’s Ratings Agency to His Anti-Alberta Conspiracy Theory?

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Washington State Shifts Ferry Fleet from Diesel to Batteries

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Tree Intercropping Would Save 17.2 Gigatons of Carbon by 2050

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Throne speech Ottawa 2019 climate action emissions Trudeau Payette

      Wilkinson Vows Tougher 2030 Emissions Target as Throne Speech Promises Net-Zero by 2050

      December 6, 2019
       
      Primary Author Compiled by The Energy Mix staff
      December 6, 2019
    • Canadian Food Prices Set to Rise $487 Per Family, with Climate a Major Cause

      December 6, 2019
       
      December 6, 2019

    Partners

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    Copyright 2019 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.