The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

logo

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
Advanced Search
Carbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionCitiesCoalElectricity GridLegal & RegulatorySub-National GovernmentsUnited States
Home›Climate & Society›Carbon Levels & Measurement›22 U.S. States, Seven Cities Challenge Trump Rollback of Obama Clean Power Plan

22 U.S. States, Seven Cities Challenge Trump Rollback of Obama Clean Power Plan

August 18, 2019
August 18, 2019
 
44
0
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story
Pexels/Pixabay

Twenty-two U.S. states and seven cities went to court last week, trying to block the Trump administration from rolling back Obama-era restrictions on coal-fired electricity under the Clean Power Plan.

“The court challenge, led by New York’s attorney general, Letitia James, argued that the Trump administration’s [Environmental Protection Agency] had no basis for weakening an Obama-era regulation that set the first ever national limits on carbon dioxide pollution from power plants,” the New York Times reports. Depending on how it is eventually decided, the case “could determine how much leverage the federal government has to fight climate change in the future.”

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

“The science is indisputable. Our climate is changing. Ice caps are melting,” James said.

“Without significant course correction, we are careening towards a climate disaster,” she added, vowing that the coalition of states and cities “will fight back against this unlawful, do-nothing rule.”

The U.S. Supreme Court previously blocked implementation of the Clean Power Plan in 2016, the Times recalls. Now, the challenge before the U.S. Court of Appeals “argues that the Trump administration’s replacement, known as the Affordable Clean Energy rule, ignores the EPA’s responsibility under the law to set limits on greenhouse gases. The lawsuit also says the new rule would actually extend the life of dirty and aging coal-burning plants, promoting an increase in pollution instead of curbing it.”

Unlike the Clean Power Plan, the Trump rule sets no cap on actual greenhouse gas emissions. “Instead, it leaves it up to states to decide whether, or if, to scale back emissions and pick from a menu of technologies to improve power plant efficiency at the facility level,” the Times notes. As well, pursuant to the EPA’s obligation under the Clean Air Act to use the “best systems of emissions reduction,” Obama’s CPP included a range of choices—from natural gas to solar and wind, from carbon pricing to carbon capture. The Trump plan “focuses solely on new efficiency measures for individual plants,” with EPA Administrator and former coal lobbyist Andrew Wheeler now arguing the Obama approach overreached the government’s authority.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra called the “toothless” Trump rule a “fossil fuel protection plan” that artificially narrows the EPA’s authority. “The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to utilize the best system of emissions reduction that it can find,” he said. “This rule does the opposite.”

The jurisdictions joining New York and California in the suit include Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia, as well as the cities of Boulder, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and South Miami. The Times notes that Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Colorado were all parties to the previous challenge to the Clean Power Plan when their governors were Republicans.

“The blue-state coalition is getting bigger and the red-state coalition is getting smaller,” said David Doniger, senior strategic director of climate change policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council. The Times said NRDC, Sierra Club, and the U.S. Environmental Defense Fund were all expected to file their own legal challenges against the Trump rule, while the American Public Health Association and the American Lung Association had already done so.

But despite the wide lineup against the rule, the Times says James and her supporters may be playing with fire. “It is a case that could go all the way to the Supreme Court,” the paper notes. “If justices there were to ultimately decide in favour of the Trump administration, it could weaken the ability of future presidents to regulate carbon dioxide pollution from power plants, experts said, and make it  harder for the United States to tackle climate change.”

That outcome “would have a devastating effect on the ability of future administrations to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act,” said New York University environmental law specialist Richard Revesz.

TagsCities - Climate LawUS Election 2020 - Nation Steps Up
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
Carbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionCitiesCoalElectricity GridLegal & RegulatorySub-National GovernmentsUnited States

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts

    • EXCLUSIVE: Blaming Campaigners for Rising Premiums Masks Trans Mountain’s Shoddy Safety Record, Ex-Insurance Exec Says
      EXCLUSIVE: Blaming Campaigners for Rising Premiums Masks Trans Mountain’s Shoddy Safety Record, Ex-Insurance Exec Says
      March 12, 2021
    • Time to Invest Now as Governments Devote Just 18% of COVID Spending to Green Recovery
      Time to Invest Now as Governments Devote Just 18% of COVID Spending to Green Recovery
      March 12, 2021
    • Toronto City Council Calls for Ontario Gas Phaseout
      Toronto City Council Calls for Ontario Gas Phaseout
      March 12, 2021
    • Brookfield to Supply Hydro-Generated Electricity for U.S. Green Hydrogen Plant
      Brookfield to Supply Hydro-Generated Electricity for U.S. Green Hydrogen Plant
      March 12, 2021
    • A Decade After Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, Cleanup ‘Has Barely Begun’ [Sign-on]
      A Decade After Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, Cleanup ‘Has Barely Begun’ [Sign-on]
      March 12, 2021

    News Feed

    Top News

    • Republican Senators Delay Haaland Confirmation in Fossil Power Play
      March 11, 2021
    • Alberta Health Whistleblower Dr. John O’Connor Wins Free Expression Award
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    Carbon-Free Transition

    • Lost Financing Prompts Bangladesh to Cancel Nine Coal Plants
      March 11, 2021
    • Renewables Supply 88% of Portugal’s Electricity in February
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    Canada

    • Alberta Health Whistleblower Dr. John O’Connor Wins Free Expression Award
      March 11, 2021
    • Calgary Tech Company Expands, Creates 500 Jobs
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    U.S.

    • Republican Senators Delay Haaland Confirmation in Fossil Power Play
      March 11, 2021
    • Mississippi Regulator Forces Power Company to Shut Unneeded Coal, Gas Plants
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    International

    • Kerala State, India Installs Solar to Turn 75,000 Homes into ‘Mini-Power Stations’
      March 11, 2021
    • Wind Moves Ahead in France as Gas Demand Lags
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Copyright
    Copyright 2020 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.