The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

logo

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
Advanced Search
Auto & Alternative VehiclesBiodiversity & HabitatBuildingsCanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementDemand & EfficiencyEnergy PoliticsFinance & InvestmentFirst PeoplesLegal & RegulatoryOceansOil & GasPipelines/Rail TransportSolarSub-National GovernmentsTar Sands/Oil SandsTransitWind
Home›Demand & Distribution›Auto & Alternative Vehicles›Garossino: Despite Pipeline Approval, $70-Billion Federal Plan is Canada’s Best Shot at Decarbonizing

Garossino: Despite Pipeline Approval, $70-Billion Federal Plan is Canada’s Best Shot at Decarbonizing

July 4, 2019
July 4, 2019
 
190
2
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story
Justin Trudeau/Facebook

While the Trudeau government disappointed its climate allies with its much-anticipated decision to re-approve the controversial Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, it has also crafted a more complicated record on energy and carbon by committing to C$70 billion in low-carbon investment over a 12-year span, reporter Sandy Garossino writes in a provocative post last week for National Observer.

The net result for anyone trying to assess the entirety of that record: It’s complicated.

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

“For many Canadians, blocking TMX became synonymous with winning the climate war. If you support the pipeline, you’re a sellout. If you don’t, you’re a climate hero,” she writes.

“If only things were that simple.”

Garossino weighs the “unforgiving” carbon calculus of Canada’s rising greenhouse gas emissions against the political reality that has seen premiers like Ontario’s Kathleen Wynne and Alberta’s Rachel Notley, both allies for Trudeau’s GHG reduction effort, lose political support, their own ambitious climate plans undone by the governments that replaced them. “The same fate awaited Trudeau if he had cancelled TMX,” she writes. “Nothing else would have mattered—he’d have been gone by November, along with everything his government has achieved.”

From that starting point, she concludes that “we have to do better than rally around symbols. We have to do the much harder work of changing the game.”

The fight the climate community can’t afford to lose, Garossino says, is the transition to clean energy. And on that score, “the Canadian government has amassed a stunning war chest of more than $60 billion, with billions more on the way.” In addition to the broader policy moves in the pan-Canadian climate plan, the dollar commitments listed by the federal finance department include:

• $26.9 billion over 12 years for green infrastructure;

• $28.7 billion over 10 years for public transportation infrastructure;

• $2 billion over two years for in the Low Carbon Economy Fund;

• $1.5 billion over five years for the Oceans Protection Plan;

• $1.3 billion over five years for the Nature Legacy;

• $2.3 billion over five years for clean technology funding (though the technology that funding supports isn’t always exactly clean);

• $1.0 billion in energy efficiency investments through the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

Garossino also accepts the government’s promise that Trans Mountain will generate tax revenue and sale income that can be reinvested in the post-carbon transition. But either way, “there is so much more to reaching our Paris climate goals than a single pipeline,” she writes. With the Parliamentary Budget Officer pointing to a 79-million-tonne gap between the country’s Harper-era carbon target and its current performance, “the Liberal plan is to push that 79-megatonne number down using a spectrum of transportation, electrification, building innovation, and infrastructure initiatives, funded by general revenues, long-term debt, and TMX-generated taxes. That $70 billion will go a long way to getting 79 megatonnes to zero, maybe even further.”

Garossino’s bigger question is about politics and the art of the possible.

“We could cancel TMX tomorrow. The global network would recalculate supply routes faster than Google Maps, with no measurable GHG impact,” she writes.

“Canadian investor confidence would plummet, and in this challenging international environment Canada could enter recession very rapidly, eroding the government’s ability to meet its existing climate commitments.

“Trudeau would lose the next election, and Andrew Scheer would stop the Liberals’ climate plan in its tracks, just as Alberta and Ontario have done.

“That $70 billion for clean energy? Gone.

“The carbon tax? Gone.”

So while “no environmentalist or supporter of Indigenous communities wants to see the oil industry’s relentless expansion continue,” the country also has the $70 billion in place, two proposed pipelines dead, a third one on life support, and a litany of other regulatory changes on the books. “There’s no way to describe this other than as a revolutionary, ambitious, comprehensive, and powerful climate and conservation plan that makes compromises to preserve jobs and investor confidence,” she writes.

“Are there flaws? Of course there are, and will be,” including insufficient attention to Indigenous land interests and self-determination. “But in climate terms, this is a good bargain, maybe the best achievable plan we’ll see. It will set the course for decades into our children’s and grandchildren’s future,” making this “the most momentous opportunity in Canada’s climate history” and a chance that “won’t come again.”

TagsBitumen BubbleBitumen Bubble Canada’s Pipeline Climate Policy ParadoxCanada Election 2019 - Climate Action Gap
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
Auto & Alternative VehiclesBiodiversity & HabitatBuildingsCanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementDemand & EfficiencyEnergy PoliticsFinance & InvestmentFirst PeoplesLegal & RegulatoryOceansOil & GasPipelines/Rail TransportSolarSub-National GovernmentsTar Sands/Oil SandsTransitWind

    2 comments

    1. Harrison: Building a Pipeline is Not a Climate Plan – Enjeux énergies et environnement 8 July, 2019 at 00:53 Reply

      […] Kathryn Harrison, in a blistering retort to National Observer columnist Sandy Garossino’s recent post on Ottawa’s C$70-billion climate […]

    2. Randal Hadland 8 July, 2019 at 10:30 Reply

      “There’s no way to describe this other than as a…” momentous sellout of the future . We don’t need the money from the tar sands to make the switch. That is like using tar to clean your hands, it doesn’t work worth crap. Investor confidence might wain if we don’t construct a money losing, socially unacceptable, environmentally destructive and climate change causing energy infrastructure that would have to work for 50 years to pay for itself? Well maybe those aren’t really investors, maybe they are just rip off artists, and we can lose them comfortably.

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts

    • EXCLUSIVE: Blaming Campaigners for Rising Premiums Masks Trans Mountain’s Shoddy Safety Record, Ex-Insurance Exec Says
      EXCLUSIVE: Blaming Campaigners for Rising Premiums Masks Trans Mountain’s Shoddy Safety Record, Ex-Insurance Exec Says
      March 12, 2021
    • Time to Invest Now as Governments Devote Just 18% of COVID Spending to Green Recovery
      Time to Invest Now as Governments Devote Just 18% of COVID Spending to Green Recovery
      March 12, 2021
    • Toronto City Council Calls for Ontario Gas Phaseout
      Toronto City Council Calls for Ontario Gas Phaseout
      March 12, 2021
    • Brookfield to Supply Hydro-Generated Electricity for U.S. Green Hydrogen Plant
      Brookfield to Supply Hydro-Generated Electricity for U.S. Green Hydrogen Plant
      March 12, 2021
    • A Decade After Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, Cleanup ‘Has Barely Begun’ [Sign-on]
      A Decade After Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, Cleanup ‘Has Barely Begun’ [Sign-on]
      March 12, 2021

    News Feed

    Top News

    • Republican Senators Delay Haaland Confirmation in Fossil Power Play
      March 11, 2021
    • Alberta Health Whistleblower Dr. John O’Connor Wins Free Expression Award
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    Carbon-Free Transition

    • Lost Financing Prompts Bangladesh to Cancel Nine Coal Plants
      March 11, 2021
    • Renewables Supply 88% of Portugal’s Electricity in February
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    Canada

    • Alberta Health Whistleblower Dr. John O’Connor Wins Free Expression Award
      March 11, 2021
    • Calgary Tech Company Expands, Creates 500 Jobs
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    U.S.

    • Republican Senators Delay Haaland Confirmation in Fossil Power Play
      March 11, 2021
    • Mississippi Regulator Forces Power Company to Shut Unneeded Coal, Gas Plants
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    International

    • Kerala State, India Installs Solar to Turn 75,000 Homes into ‘Mini-Power Stations’
      March 11, 2021
    • Wind Moves Ahead in France as Gas Demand Lags
      March 11, 2021

    Read More

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Copyright
    Copyright 2020 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.