The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

logo

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
Advanced Search
CanadaEnergy PoliticsLegal & RegulatoryOil & Gas
Home›Jurisdictions›Canada›Senators Table Competing Amendments to Bill C-69

Senators Table Competing Amendments to Bill C-69

May 9, 2019
May 9, 2019
 
58
1
Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story
Mightydrake/Wikimedia Commons

After a relentless push by the fossil lobby and others in the natural resource sector, Conservative and Independent members of the Senate Energy Committee are proposing hundreds of changes to Bill C-69, the proposed federal Impact Assessment Act.

Many of the proposed amendments are “aimed at clarifying language around the scope and the length of the assessment process, the role of the environment minister, and how much public participation should be permitted during regulatory hearings,” CBC reports. “The changes are meant to address industry and provincial government claims that the bill, as written, could cripple the natural resources sector.”

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

CBC takes it as evidence of “frosty relations” between the two Senate caucuses that they declined to share their proposed amendments before debate on the competing packages began Tuesday. Senators face a looming deadline to complete their work on the bill before Parliament rises around June 30, ahead of the federal election this fall.

The two groups appear to be “largely aligned already on the bill’s perceived flaws and how they might go about fixing them,” CBC notes. “Even the government has some amendments it would like to make to the bill before it clears the final legislative hurdles.”

But that doesn’t mean Independent and Liberal members were prepared to accept an integrated set of amendments, introduced by Conservative deputy committee chair Sen. Michael MacDonald on just a few minutes’ notice, that had been drafted in large part by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA), among other stakeholders.

Critics including CAPP “have demanded changes designed to prevent public policy debates from being part of project assessments, restrict application intervenors to those directly affected by the project or with expertise, set firm timelines, and limit government ministers’ discretionary powers,” CBC reports in a dispatch from Calgary. And Enbridge CEO Al Monaco said it’s “critical” for Canada’s energy future that the bill undergo substantive changes.

But that doesn’t mean all the members of the Senate committee are prepared to be railroaded.

“I ask all senators to think very carefully about whether it is appropriate for senators in the upper house of the Canadian Parliament to take a substantial package, written entirely by an industry group, and to adopt it, holus bolus, without our value-added or sober second thought,” said Sen. Yuen Pau Woo, facilitator of the Independent Senators Group. “We’re senators, we’re not stenographers. We do not believe we should simply be taking verbiage from interest groups and approving them,” so “we must reject this proposal to vote for 192 pages of amendments in one shot.”

“The Opposition in the Senate will stand with the opponents of Bill C-69,” countered a spokesperson for Conservative Senate Leader Larry Smith. “These opponents represent key economic sectors that drive economic growth.”

Independent Alberta Sen. Paula Simons said it would be “ridiculous” for the two factions to reject each other’s amendments on partisan grounds, adding that she saw many similarities between the two sets of proposals. “There’s not a lot of radical difference,” she said. “There’s not actually a tremendous amount of daylight between them.”

CBC has a capsule comparison of the two, noting that “the Independent senators have made a number of amendments that would, among other things, limit the environment minister’s ability to interfere in the regulatory process and stop and start project timelines. The Conservative caucus, meanwhile, wants to curb public participation in the review process to ensure timely decisions, while solidifying the role of the offshore petroleum boards.”

The next step in the committee’s process is for the Senate law clerk to review the two sets of amendments, cut out the duplication, and present a “more focused list of amendments” for the committee to consider, the national broadcaster states.

Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
CanadaEnergy PoliticsLegal & RegulatoryOil & Gas

    1 comment

    1. Oilpatch Journalist Debunks Krause’s Conspiracy Theories About Anti-Pipeline Campaigners – Enjeux énergies et environnement 20 May, 2019 at 21:57 Reply

      […] bill—still in the Senate, which is considering significant amendments—is hugely controversial, partly because the oil and gas industry claims it will ensure not a […]

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts

    • EXCLUSIVE: Study Shows Governments’ Oil and Gas Revenue Crashing as Decarbonization Takes Hold
      EXCLUSIVE: Study Shows Governments’ Oil and Gas Revenue Crashing as Decarbonization Takes Hold
      February 12, 2021
    • Countries Must Cut Emissions 80% Beyond Paris Pledges, but Study Author Sees Glimmers of Hope
      Countries Must Cut Emissions 80% Beyond Paris Pledges, but Study Author Sees Glimmers of Hope
      February 12, 2021
    • Fund Low-Income Building Retrofits in Upcoming Budget, Efficiency Canada Urges Ottawa [Sign-Ons]
      Fund Low-Income Building Retrofits in Upcoming Budget, Efficiency Canada Urges Ottawa [Sign-Ons]
      February 12, 2021
    • Big City Mayors Cheer as Trudeau Offers Permanent Federal Transit Funding
      Big City Mayors Cheer as Trudeau Offers Permanent Federal Transit Funding
      February 12, 2021
    • India Was Forewarned About Himalayan Flood Disaster Risks
      India Was Forewarned About Himalayan Flood Disaster Risks
      February 12, 2021

    News Feed

    Top News

    • Enviros Warn California Blackout Prevention Plan Could Drive Up Gas Consumption
      February 11, 2021
    • London Hedge Funds Bet on US$100 Carbon Price
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    Carbon-Free Transition

    • London Hedge Funds Bet on US$100 Carbon Price
      February 11, 2021
    • Smart Cameras on Wind Turbines Cut Eagle Deaths by 82%
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    Canada

    • Alberta Looks to Lithium in Oil Deposits to Stock Electric Vehicle Batteries
      February 11, 2021
    • Students Demand Faster Action After UVic Moves $80 Million to Low-Carbon Investment Fund
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    U.S.

    • Enviros Warn California Blackout Prevention Plan Could Drive Up Gas Consumption
      February 11, 2021
    • U.S. Fossil Utilities Fund Republicans in Georgia Runoff Elections
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    International

    • Students at France’s Elite Universities Want Climate at Heart of Curriculum
      February 11, 2021
    • South Africa Aims to Buy 6,800 MW of Renewables this Year
      February 11, 2021

    Read More

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Copyright
    Copyright 2020 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.