The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Climate Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • Pipeline Politics
      • COP24
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Podcasts & Webinars
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Partners
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • Climate & Society
    • Carbon-Free Transition
    • Carbon Levels & Measurement
    • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
    • Climate Denial
    • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
    • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
    • Demographics
    • Energy Politics
    • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
    • Energy Subsidies
    • Finance & Investment
    • First Peoples
    • Insurance & Liability
    • International Agencies & Studies
    • Jobs
    • Legal & Regulatory
    • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Methane
    • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
  • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
    • Biodiversity & Habitat
    • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
    • Food Security
    • Forests & Deforestation
    • Health & Safety
    • Heat & Temperature
    • Human Rights & Equity
    • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
    • International Security, Migration & War
    • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Soil & Natural Sequestration
    • Water
  • Demand & Distribution
    • Air & Marine
    • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
    • Batteries/Storage
    • Buildings
    • Cities
    • Electricity Grid
    • Energy Access & Equity
    • Off-Grid
    • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Supply Chains & Consumption
    • Transit
    • Walking & Biking
  • Jurisdictions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • India
    • International
    • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Sub-National Governments
    • United States
  • Non-Renewable Energy
    • CCS & Geoengineering
    • Coal
    • Nuclear
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pipelines/Rail Transport
    • Shale & Fracking
    • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
  • Renewable Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Demand & Efficiency
    • General Renewables
    • Geothermal
    • Hydro
    • Research & Development
    • Solar
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Wind

logo

The Energy Mix

  • Climate & Society
    • Carbon-Free Transition
    • Carbon Levels & Measurement
    • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
    • Climate Denial
    • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
    • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
    • Demographics
    • Energy Politics
    • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
    • Energy Subsidies
    • Finance & Investment
    • First Peoples
    • Insurance & Liability
    • International Agencies & Studies
    • Jobs
    • Legal & Regulatory
    • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Methane
    • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
  • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
    • Biodiversity & Habitat
    • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
    • Food Security
    • Forests & Deforestation
    • Health & Safety
    • Heat & Temperature
    • Human Rights & Equity
    • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
    • International Security, Migration & War
    • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Soil & Natural Sequestration
    • Water
  • Demand & Distribution
    • Air & Marine
    • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
    • Batteries/Storage
    • Buildings
    • Cities
    • Electricity Grid
    • Energy Access & Equity
    • Off-Grid
    • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Supply Chains & Consumption
    • Transit
    • Walking & Biking
  • Jurisdictions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • India
    • International
    • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Sub-National Governments
    • United States
  • Non-Renewable Energy
    • CCS & Geoengineering
    • Coal
    • Nuclear
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pipelines/Rail Transport
    • Shale & Fracking
    • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
  • Renewable Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Demand & Efficiency
    • General Renewables
    • Geothermal
    • Hydro
    • Research & Development
    • Solar
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Wind
Advanced Search
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Climate Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • Pipeline Politics
      • COP24
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Podcasts & Webinars
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Partners
  • Contact
Carbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsCoalFinance & InvestmentInternational Agencies & StudiesMedia, Messaging, & Public OpinionOil & Gas
Home›Climate & Society›Carbon Levels & Measurement›Bloomberg Columnist Echoes Calls for 1.5°C Scenarios from IEA

Bloomberg Columnist Echoes Calls for 1.5°C Scenarios from IEA

April 14, 2019
April 14, 2019
 
39
0
Share:
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    2
    Shares
  Print This Story
Gina Dittmer/PublicDomainPictures

A Bloomberg News opinion columnist is turning to Google Maps as an analogy for an annual energy futures roadmap from the International Energy Agency (IEA) that has policy-makers presuming continuing high demand for fossil fuels, rather than giving serious consideration to off-fossil strategies that will help get climate change under control.

While Google Maps and the IEA’s annual World Energy Outlook (WEO) report both offer their users multiple options, Liam Denning says he usually picks the route Google Maps recommends, without giving the matter much thought. He contends that most energy analysts do the same with the range of scenarios in the WEO. The difference is that, while the wrong choice of Google Maps options might get you stuck in traffic for a few extra minutes, taking the IEA’s high-end scenarios as predictions of the future turns the possibility of increased fossil fuel demand into a reality that will drive global climate change out of control.

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

In a letter to IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol released earlier this month by Oil Change International, representatives of about 60 investment funds, scientific agencies, and think tanks are warning that the decision-makers who rely on the Outlook to anticipate future energy trends rarely look beyond its primary, higher-carbon scenario. Denning’s column elaborates on that conversation and brings it to a wider business audience.

“The WEO is structured around three scenarios: ‘New Policies,’ ‘Current Policies’, and ‘Sustainable Development,’” he explains. “The first is the de facto central case, the second is effectively a higher-emissions scenario, and the third models a world limiting global warming to ‘well below’ 2.0°C,” consistent with the main targets in the 2015 Paris Agreement.

But now, in line with last year’s urgent IPCC report on 1.5°C pathways, “the group urges the IEA to make the Sustainable Development scenario the central case, make it fully transparent, and tighten it up,” he writes. “The current version implies a high probability of limiting the temperature increase to between 1.7 and 1.8°C  by the end of the century, partly by assuming an increase in carbon capture by many orders of magnitude, particularly after 2040. The group wants an updated scenario to target 1.5° and be more cautious in assuming carbon capture takes off. Meanwhile, it wants the IEA to stick the equivalent of a tobacco warning on the New Policies scenario, which implies warming of 2.7 to 3.0°C.”

Arguing about tenths of a degree in 2040 “may strike you as esoteric,” Denning concedes. “But when the author is the IEA, that projection doesn’t merely hold up a hypothetical reality, it helps create reality.”

That doesn’t mean the IEA “should be blamed for how its scenarios get used (and abused),” he adds. “Yet the WEO’s detail and provenance mean it is widely used as a road map for our energy future. Moreover, it’s a map used by the people, companies, and institutions planning and building the roads. If its scenarios point a certain way, then investments will be made accordingly in such things as power plants, pipelines, and oil and gas fields, facts on the ground with multi-decade lifespans.”

The IEA’s own analysis shows how much difference a tenth of a degree can make, Denning adds.

“Whereas the Sustainable Development scenario projects global oil demand dropping to 63 million barrels a day in 2040— more than a third below today’s level—the 1.5°C scenario takes it below 40 million, a level last seen in 1968,” he writes. “Natural gas demand, meanwhile, flips from being roughly flat with today’s level under Sustainable Development’s assumptions to dropping by more than a third, back to where it was in 1999. In some ways, that gas figure is even more shocking, given the widely held view that it will come into its own and act symbiotically with renewable energy. The IEA even touted a ‘Golden Age of Gas’ scenario in its 2011 outlook, and oil majors have invested billions in turning themselves into Big Gas.”

Birol says the immediate challenge is to move governments off their current 2.7°C pathway and toward the 1.7° in the New Policies scenario. But “the numbers show that incrementalism is a road to ruin, and the transformation in energy supply and consumption required for a better road is staggering,” Denning writes. With a massive bond offer from Saudi Aramco “reportedly generating overwhelming demand,” and financial markets still looking kindly on new coal plants across Asia, investors are still putting “money down on a future that looks very like our past, except with rising sea levels.”

At very least, Denning says those realities argue for the IEA to emphasize the “embedded risks” in its New Policies scenario, while expanding its 1.5°C analysis to show what it will take to mitigate those risks. “Even better would be an open version of the IEA’s model, helping investors, policy groups, and others run their own scenarios on the impact of such things as the cost of different energies; carbon pricing; the likely penetration of renewable and sequestration technologies; and, perhaps most difficult of all, feedback loops as climate change affects economic growth and other macro inputs.”

Share:
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    2
    Shares
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
Carbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsCoalFinance & InvestmentInternational Agencies & StudiesMedia, Messaging, & Public OpinionOil & Gas

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Subscribe to The Energy Mix

    The Energy Mix is your guide to climate change and energy issues and solutions. Whether you’re looking for the latest content on the impacts of climate change, the fossil industries that produce the emissions, renewable energy and energy efficiency alternatives, or climate solutions outside energy, you’ve come to the right place. Please send us your comments and story ideas!

    SEE OUR LATEST DIGEST

    Recent Posts

    AustraliaBrazilCanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionChinaClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsEnergy PoliticsEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsEuropeFinance & InvestmentFirst PeoplesIndiaInternational Agencies & StudiesLegal & RegulatoryMexico, Caribbean & Latin AmericaMiddle EastOil & GasSmall Island StatesSub-National GovernmentsUnited States

    Canada Pledges Net Zero by 2050 as Major Emitters Dig In to Block COP 25 ...

    Canada earned praise for promising to legislate a 2050 deadline for net-zero carbon emissions, but big emitters like Australia, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, India, and China were called out for blocking ...
    • VW

      Enviros Call for Billions in Fines After VW Canada Pleads Guilty to Dieselgate Charges

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Wilkinson Throws Cold Water on Carbon Credits for LNG Exports

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Logging Costs Ontario 650,000 Hectares of Forest, 16.5 Mt of Carbon Storage Over 30 Years

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • New York State Loses Anti-Fraud Case Against ExxonMobil

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Oceans Face Oxygen Loss, Acidification as Warming Challenges Ability to Absorb Carbon

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • 12-Point Agenda Lays Out Possibilities for Global Energy Efficiency Gains

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Battery Costs Plummet 50% in Three Years, 87% Since 2010

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Wildfire

      PG&E, Wildfire Victims Reach $13.5-Billion Settlement

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Rural Municipalities Take the Hit as Alberta Cuts Taxes for Gas Producers

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Canadian Sustainable Beef Standard is ‘Marbled with Loopholes’

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Crossword Puzzle Tests COP Delegates’ Knowledge on Fossil Fuel Phaseout

      December 11, 2019
       
      Primary Author The Energy Mix staff
      December 11, 2019
    • landfill

      Landfill Methane Would Save 2.5 Gigatons of Emissions by 2050

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • U.S., Canadian Fossils to Lead $1.4 Trillion in New Oil and Gas Development Through 2024

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Denmark to Cut Emissions 70% by 2030 While New Zealand Adopts Climate Policy Lens

      Full Story: Climate Home News @ClimateHome

      December 9, 2019
       
      Primary Author Jocelyn Timperley @jloistf
      December 9, 2019

    Partners

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    Copyright 2019 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.