The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

logo

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
Advanced Search
CanadaEnergy PoliticsEnergy SubsidiesEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsFinance & InvestmentPipelines/Rail Transport
Home›Jurisdictions›Canada›‘Built on Quicksand, Clear as Mud’: Trans Mountain Costs Are Impossible to Track, IEEFA Warns

‘Built on Quicksand, Clear as Mud’: Trans Mountain Costs Are Impossible to Track, IEEFA Warns

April 11, 2019
April 11, 2019
 
241
2
Share:
  •  
  • 35
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    35
    Shares
  Print This Story
PIPELINE_MANAGER/wikimedia commons

The financial arrangements behind Canadian taxpayers’ involuntary acquisition of the controversial Trans Mountain Pipeline are “built on quicksand and clear as mud”, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis reports this week, in an assessment that urges the Trudeau government to be more transparent about what the project is costing now and how it’ll be paid for in the future.

“The government of Canada has structured the acquisition of the Trans Mountain Pipeline, its planned expansion, and ongoing operation in a way [that renders] it impossible to determine how much taxpayers are paying now and will pay in the future,” write IEEFA Director of Finance Tom Sanzillo and Financial Analyst Kathy Hipple in the executive summary of the report. The government’s accounting approach “may also impair the government’s ability to market and sell the completed pipeline in the commercial market and to report transparently to the public on its financial performance.”

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

While the Trudeau government frames the Trans Mountain expansion as an economic development project that needn’t conform to standard measures of commercial success or failure, “the government has an obligation to tell its citizens how much the Trans Mountain Pipeline project is costing,” they add. “In fact, a careful, ongoing accounting is of even greater importance given: the controversial nature of the project, the lack of commercial standards, the size and complexity of the acquisition, construction and operations, and the risks involved with a resale of the pipeline in a low-priced, volatile global oil and gas market.”

Hipple warned that “people should be concerned, not only about the ongoing fiscal implications of the Trans Mountain Pipeline project, but also about how much of the $6 billion and counting investment will ultimately be recovered when the government sells the finished pipeline.”

In a release, IEEFA points to the complexity of a project that involves multiple federal agencies and public or private companies. “The Canadian government has already routed payments to fund and develop the pipeline through a maze of government agencies with different missions, reporting mechanisms, and accounting standards,” the release notes.

“By the time an outside observer tracks where this money is going, it will be difficult to determine who borrowed what from whom, how much is owed by which government agency, who is paying it back, and how much—if any—will be repaid,” the report warns. “This situation can be remedied, but it will take thoughtful executive action and leadership to address. The executive needs to design a tax-dollar monitoring project that brings all of the debt, financing costs, revenues, and expenses into one set of books.”

IEEFA lays out an accounting blueprint that would get at how much Canadian taxpayers have already spent on the project, how much spending is ahead in the form of construction and subsidies, which federal agencies are responsible for paying off the project’s debts and on what terms, the existing pipeline’s current and future revenue and expenses, and how any eventual net revenue will be used.

“What is needed is a clear monitoring plan that has the support of the executive and legislative branches of the Canadian government that would provide the public with a regular report on how much is being spent, and, ultimately, how much the project will cost,” IEEFA asserts. “Absent such a transparent approach, government or corporate officials may offer figures that will be inherently misleading. The public debate on a sensitive and controversial issue could ultimately be reduced to a frustrating array of charges and counter-charges without a rigorous monitoring plan in place.”

TagsBitumen BubbleBitumen Bubble Finance & DivestmentCanada Election 2019 - Pipeline Politics
Share:
  •  
  • 35
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    35
    Shares
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
CanadaEnergy PoliticsEnergy SubsidiesEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsFinance & InvestmentPipelines/Rail Transport

    2 comments

    1. ‘Built on Quicksand, Clear as Mud’: Trans Mountain Costs Are Impossible to Track, IEEFA Warns – Enjeux énergies et environnement 12 April, 2019 at 00:04 Reply

      […] The Energy Mix https://theenergymix.com/2019/04/11/built-on-quicksand-clear-as-mud-trans-mountain-costs-are-impossi… via […]

    2. Catherine Dougan 12 April, 2019 at 11:58 Reply

      I know of some senior persons working on the LNG North of Kitimat… Apparently, $ is no object.. Big oil $

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts

    • Climate Deniers Cheer Trump’s Murderous Mob as Campaigners Decry Preferential Treatment
      Climate Deniers Cheer Trump’s Murderous Mob as Campaigners Decry Preferential Treatment
      January 11, 2021
    • UK Accused of ‘Rank Hypocrisy’ After Allowing New Underground Coal Mine
      UK Accused of ‘Rank Hypocrisy’ After Allowing New Underground Coal Mine
      January 11, 2021
    • Parade of Alberta Coal Developments Threatens Recreation Areas, Biodiversity
      Parade of Alberta Coal Developments Threatens Recreation Areas, Biodiversity
      January 11, 2021
    • 2020 Ties 2016 for Hottest Year on Record
      2020 Ties 2016 for Hottest Year on Record
      January 10, 2021
    • Forest Carbon Offsets on the Agenda as France’s One Planet Summit Confronts Biodiversity Loss
      Forest Carbon Offsets on the Agenda as France’s One Planet Summit Confronts Biodiversity Loss
      January 10, 2021

    News Feed

    Top News

    • Climate-Related Hunger, Drought, Conflict to Cost Kenya $62 Billion
      January 10, 2021
    • Canada Pushes Back on ‘Unwarranted’ U.S. Solar Tariffs
      January 10, 2021

    Read More

    Carbon-Free Transition

    • Renewables Output Exceeds Fossil for First Time in Germany
      January 10, 2021
    • UK Citizens’ Assembly Prompts Participants to Change their Lives
      January 10, 2021

    Read More

    Canada

    • Canada Pushes Back on ‘Unwarranted’ U.S. Solar Tariffs
      January 10, 2021
    • Lion Electric Offers Amazon a 15.8% Share
      January 10, 2021

    Read More

    U.S.

    • North Dakota Fossils Demand Relief on Royalty Payments
      January 10, 2021
    • Systemic Racism Limits Minority Businesses’ Access to Energy Efficiency Dollars
      January 10, 2021

    Read More

    International

    • India Earmarks $60B for New Gas Infrastructure
      January 10, 2021
    • Storm Drives UK Wind Above 50% of Power Supply on Boxing Day
      January 10, 2021

    Read More

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Copyright
    Copyright 2020 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.