The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Climate Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • Pipeline Politics
      • COP24
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Podcasts & Webinars
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Partners
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • Climate & Society
    • Carbon-Free Transition
    • Carbon Levels & Measurement
    • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
    • Climate Denial
    • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
    • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
    • Demographics
    • Energy Politics
    • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
    • Energy Subsidies
    • Finance & Investment
    • First Peoples
    • Insurance & Liability
    • International Agencies & Studies
    • Jobs
    • Legal & Regulatory
    • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Methane
    • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
  • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
    • Biodiversity & Habitat
    • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
    • Food Security
    • Forests & Deforestation
    • Health & Safety
    • Heat & Temperature
    • Human Rights & Equity
    • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
    • International Security, Migration & War
    • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Soil & Natural Sequestration
    • Water
  • Demand & Distribution
    • Air & Marine
    • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
    • Batteries/Storage
    • Buildings
    • Cities
    • Electricity Grid
    • Energy Access & Equity
    • Off-Grid
    • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Supply Chains & Consumption
    • Transit
    • Walking & Biking
  • Jurisdictions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • India
    • International
    • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Sub-National Governments
    • United States
  • Non-Renewable Energy
    • CCS & Geoengineering
    • Coal
    • Nuclear
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pipelines/Rail Transport
    • Shale & Fracking
    • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
  • Renewable Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Demand & Efficiency
    • General Renewables
    • Geothermal
    • Hydro
    • Research & Development
    • Solar
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Wind

logo

The Energy Mix

  • Climate & Society
    • Carbon-Free Transition
    • Carbon Levels & Measurement
    • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
    • Climate Denial
    • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
    • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
    • Demographics
    • Energy Politics
    • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
    • Energy Subsidies
    • Finance & Investment
    • First Peoples
    • Insurance & Liability
    • International Agencies & Studies
    • Jobs
    • Legal & Regulatory
    • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Methane
    • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
  • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
    • Biodiversity & Habitat
    • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
    • Food Security
    • Forests & Deforestation
    • Health & Safety
    • Heat & Temperature
    • Human Rights & Equity
    • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
    • International Security, Migration & War
    • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Soil & Natural Sequestration
    • Water
  • Demand & Distribution
    • Air & Marine
    • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
    • Batteries/Storage
    • Buildings
    • Cities
    • Electricity Grid
    • Energy Access & Equity
    • Off-Grid
    • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Supply Chains & Consumption
    • Transit
    • Walking & Biking
  • Jurisdictions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • India
    • International
    • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Sub-National Governments
    • United States
  • Non-Renewable Energy
    • CCS & Geoengineering
    • Coal
    • Nuclear
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pipelines/Rail Transport
    • Shale & Fracking
    • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
  • Renewable Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Demand & Efficiency
    • General Renewables
    • Geothermal
    • Hydro
    • Research & Development
    • Solar
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Wind
Advanced Search
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Climate Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • Pipeline Politics
      • COP24
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Podcasts & Webinars
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Partners
  • Contact
CanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsDrought, Famine & WildfiresForests & Deforestation
Home›Jurisdictions›Canada›Canada’s Forests Emit More Carbon Than They Absorb, But Ottawa Spins a Different Story

Canada’s Forests Emit More Carbon Than They Absorb, But Ottawa Spins a Different Story

February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
 
1,209
0
Share:
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    20
    Shares
  Print This Story
peupleloup/Wikimedia Commons

A mid-February analysis on CBC gets at one of the most persistent myths in Canadian carbon accounting—that the country’s forests absorb more carbon than they emit, or in some erroneous versions of the story, soak up so much carbon dioxide that there’s no need to worry about the rest of the country’s emissions.

The report comes at a time when the federal government is pushing for a new accounting approach that would allow it to take even more credit for forests as a carbon sink.

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

“Trees don’t just absorb carbon when they grow, they emit it when they die and decompose, or burn,” CBC explains. “When you add up both the absorption and emission, Canada’s forests haven’t been a net carbon sink since 2001. Due largely to forest fires and insect infestations, the trees have actually added to our country’s greenhouse gas emissions for each of the past 15 years on record.”

Last month, Sierra Club B.C. calculated British Columbia’s uncounted forestry emissions at more than 400 megatonnes over two years, largely due to two seasons of raging wildfires. Environment and Climate Change Canada places the country’s net forest emissions at about 78 Mt for 2016, the last year for which official statistics are available.

So it’s no surprise that Canada “has historically excluded its forests when accounting for its total greenhouse emissions to the rest of the world,” CBC writes. “We had that option, under international agreements, and it was in our interest to leave the trees out of the total tabulation, since they would have boosted our overall emissions.” Canada’s greenhouse gas accounting methods also leave out emissions and absorptions from wetlands and farmland, “and with good reason, if the goal is to reduce emissions on paper”.

But now, the federal government is trying something new. Canada is “making the case to the United Nations that things like forest fires and pine beetle infestations shouldn’t count against us, and that only human-related changes to our forests should be included when doing the calculations that matter to our emission reduction targets.” That would mean leaving out impacts like the wildfire emissions documented by Sierra Club.

The shift in accounting methods would position the forest as a carbon sink, rather than a source. It wouldn’t be nearly a big enough sink to account for the country’s 700 megatonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year. But CBC points out that the shift in process would “improve” Canada’s climate performance on paper, without anything actually changing on the ground.

“Canada should do as much as we can to sequester carbon naturally,” said Canadians for Clean Prosperity Executive Director Mark Cameron, a former policy advisor to then-prime minister Stephen Harper. And “we should take advantage of our forests, our wetlands.” But “it doesn’t mean that, because we have a lot of forest, we don’t have to worry about carbon emissions, which is often the line that people use.”

In a post last year for Policy Options, he added that “by switching to one of the alternative accounting methodologies for emissions from land use, forestry, and forest products allowed under the framework, Canada could narrow the gap—perhaps by as much as 63 or 126 megatonnes—even if our actual emissions don’t change.”

TagsCanada Election 2019 - Climate Action Gap
Share:
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    20
    Shares
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
CanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsDrought, Famine & WildfiresForests & Deforestation

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Subscribe to The Energy Mix

    The Energy Mix is your guide to climate change and energy issues and solutions. Whether you’re looking for the latest content on the impacts of climate change, the fossil industries that produce the emissions, renewable energy and energy efficiency alternatives, or climate solutions outside energy, you’ve come to the right place. Please send us your comments and story ideas!

    SEE OUR LATEST DIGEST

    Recent Posts

    AustraliaBrazilCanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionChinaClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsEnergy PoliticsEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsEuropeFinance & InvestmentFirst PeoplesIndiaInternational Agencies & StudiesLegal & RegulatoryMexico, Caribbean & Latin AmericaMiddle EastOil & GasSmall Island StatesSub-National GovernmentsUnited States

    Canada Pledges Net Zero by 2050 as Major Emitters Dig In to Block COP 25 ...

    Canada earned praise for promising to legislate a 2050 deadline for net-zero carbon emissions, but big emitters like Australia, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, India, and China were called out for blocking ...
    • VW

      Enviros Call for Billions in Fines After VW Canada Pleads Guilty to Dieselgate Charges

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Wilkinson Throws Cold Water on Carbon Credits for LNG Exports

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Logging Costs Ontario 650,000 Hectares of Forest, 16.5 Mt of Carbon Storage Over 30 Years

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • New York State Loses Anti-Fraud Case Against ExxonMobil

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Oceans Face Oxygen Loss, Acidification as Warming Challenges Ability to Absorb Carbon

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • 12-Point Agenda Lays Out Possibilities for Global Energy Efficiency Gains

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Battery Costs Plummet 50% in Three Years, 87% Since 2010

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Wildfire

      PG&E, Wildfire Victims Reach $13.5-Billion Settlement

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Rural Municipalities Take the Hit as Alberta Cuts Taxes for Gas Producers

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Canadian Sustainable Beef Standard is ‘Marbled with Loopholes’

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Crossword Puzzle Tests COP Delegates’ Knowledge on Fossil Fuel Phaseout

      December 11, 2019
       
      Primary Author The Energy Mix staff
      December 11, 2019
    • landfill

      Landfill Methane Would Save 2.5 Gigatons of Emissions by 2050

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • U.S., Canadian Fossils to Lead $1.4 Trillion in New Oil and Gas Development Through 2024

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Denmark to Cut Emissions 70% by 2030 While New Zealand Adopts Climate Policy Lens

      Full Story: Climate Home News @ClimateHome

      December 9, 2019
       
      Primary Author Jocelyn Timperley @jloistf
      December 9, 2019

    Partners

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    Copyright 2019 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.