The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Climate Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • Pipeline Politics
      • COP24
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Podcasts & Webinars
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Partners
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • Climate & Society
    • Carbon-Free Transition
    • Carbon Levels & Measurement
    • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
    • Climate Denial
    • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
    • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
    • Demographics
    • Energy Politics
    • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
    • Energy Subsidies
    • Finance & Investment
    • First Peoples
    • Insurance & Liability
    • International Agencies & Studies
    • Jobs
    • Legal & Regulatory
    • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Methane
    • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
  • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
    • Biodiversity & Habitat
    • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
    • Food Security
    • Forests & Deforestation
    • Health & Safety
    • Heat & Temperature
    • Human Rights & Equity
    • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
    • International Security, Migration & War
    • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Soil & Natural Sequestration
    • Water
  • Demand & Distribution
    • Air & Marine
    • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
    • Batteries/Storage
    • Buildings
    • Cities
    • Electricity Grid
    • Energy Access & Equity
    • Off-Grid
    • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Supply Chains & Consumption
    • Transit
    • Walking & Biking
  • Jurisdictions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • India
    • International
    • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Sub-National Governments
    • United States
  • Non-Renewable Energy
    • CCS & Geoengineering
    • Coal
    • Nuclear
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pipelines/Rail Transport
    • Shale & Fracking
    • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
  • Renewable Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Demand & Efficiency
    • General Renewables
    • Geothermal
    • Hydro
    • Research & Development
    • Solar
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Wind

logo

The Energy Mix

  • Climate & Society
    • Carbon-Free Transition
    • Carbon Levels & Measurement
    • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
    • Climate Denial
    • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
    • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
    • Demographics
    • Energy Politics
    • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
    • Energy Subsidies
    • Finance & Investment
    • First Peoples
    • Insurance & Liability
    • International Agencies & Studies
    • Jobs
    • Legal & Regulatory
    • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
    • Methane
    • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
  • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
    • Biodiversity & Habitat
    • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
    • Food Security
    • Forests & Deforestation
    • Health & Safety
    • Heat & Temperature
    • Human Rights & Equity
    • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
    • International Security, Migration & War
    • Severe Storms & Flooding
    • Soil & Natural Sequestration
    • Water
  • Demand & Distribution
    • Air & Marine
    • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
    • Batteries/Storage
    • Buildings
    • Cities
    • Electricity Grid
    • Energy Access & Equity
    • Off-Grid
    • Petrochemicals & Plastics
    • Supply Chains & Consumption
    • Transit
    • Walking & Biking
  • Jurisdictions
    • Africa
    • Arctic & Antarctica
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • India
    • International
    • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Oceans
    • Small Island States
    • South & Central America
    • Sub-National Governments
    • United States
  • Non-Renewable Energy
    • CCS & Geoengineering
    • Coal
    • Nuclear
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pipelines/Rail Transport
    • Shale & Fracking
    • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
  • Renewable Energy
    • Bioenergy
    • Demand & Efficiency
    • General Renewables
    • Geothermal
    • Hydro
    • Research & Development
    • Solar
    • Wave & Tidal
    • Wind
Advanced Search
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Climate Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • Pipeline Politics
      • COP24
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Podcasts & Webinars
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Partners
  • Contact
Auto & Alternative VehiclesBatteries/StorageBuildingsCanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionCitiesClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsFinance & InvestmentJobsSub-National GovernmentsTransit
Home›Demand & Distribution›Auto & Alternative Vehicles›Ontario Climate Plan Undercuts Cities’ GHG Reduction Efforts, Fails on Green Jobs

Ontario Climate Plan Undercuts Cities’ GHG Reduction Efforts, Fails on Green Jobs

January 9, 2019
January 9, 2019
 
0
0
Share:
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    21
    Shares
  Print This Story
byrev/pixabay

The Ontario government’s new climate change plan undercuts cities’ ability to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions while failing to set the stage for a green jobs strategy for Canada’s biggest province and industrial heartland, according to separate posts last month by Julia Langer of The Atmospheric Fund and Liliana Camacho of Toronto-based Horizon Advisors.

“Over 50% of Ontario’s carbon emissions originate in cities,” but the Ontario plan “could weaken cities’ potential to contribute to climate protection in three ways,” writes TAF CEO Langer. “First, the lowered 2030 carbon reduction target and lack of a long-term target could put pressure on cities to weaken their ambition, as well. Second, the availability of funding for urban climate solutions has been dramatically reduced. Third, there is little detail on the key strategies for reducing emissions.”

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

Camacho, director of clean growth at Horizon, links green jobs strategy to General Motors’ startling decision last year to shutter its auto plant in Oshawa. “On one hand, climate science clearly shows a need for innovation so that we can transition to a cleaner economy,” she writes. “On the other, economic transitions require new skills and lead to unemployment in dying industries. Ontario needs to support its market through transitions created by innovation while balancing consequences to its labour force, if we are to wholeheartedly support the shift to a green economy that improves our quality of life.”

Langer warns that cities “can’t lead from behind” in a province that has substantially weakened its 2030 carbon target—and has no 2050 target at all.

“All stakeholders need to have a short-, medium-, and long-term view to at least 80% emission reduction—net zero according to the IPCC—in order to avert irreversible impacts on our environmental, economic, and social well-being,” she warns. “Choices we make between now and 2030 will have a major impact on Ontario’s 2050 emissions, such as decisions about new buildings and infrastructure. A long-term target is key to ensuring that these decisions are evaluated against that goal, or we risk getting locked into a pathway that is inconsistent with a stable climate. Each year we delay reductions, the harder, slower, and more expensive it gets.”

The new plan also provides 90% less provincial funding than was available under the former Liberal government. Langer gives Ontario a hat-tip for setting up the new Ontario Carbon Trust as a revolving fund, but notes that “for cities that need capital to advance low-carbon solutions—like retrofitting our aging building stock, building out and electrifying transportation, and local distributed generation and storage—this represents a significant setback.”

She adds that “TAF is pleased to see that the plan includes numerous other key urban carbon reduction strategies, like strengthening the building code, banning organic waste from landfills, and expanding natural gas conservation programs.” But in the end, “cities with more aggressive targets may feel out on a limb and lacking some of the key provincially-controlled tools and levers for advancing urban reductions.”

Where Langer focuses on the climate plan’s implications for municipalities, Camacho takes a similar tone in relation to industrial development and innovation, taking the province to task for failing to set up “strategic retraining opportunities” that would have helped GM workers find a place in emerging industries. She says that work could and should have begun when the U.S.-based automaker first indicated that production at Oshawa was only guaranteed until 2020.

“Prominent environmental and labour organizations in Ontario have been proposing the creation of an Ontario green jobs strategy for some time now, and a recent report by the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario suggested investment in education and training is needed to capitalize on economic opportunities of clean tech innovation,” she writes. “For example, building retrofits and green construction is an area of growing demand that can provide good work opportunities in the Greater Toronto Area for skilled workers.”

Yet “Ontario’s new climate change plan does not invest in enhancing labour capacity in green industries. This is a crucial omission.”

Share:
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    21
    Shares
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
Auto & Alternative VehiclesBatteries/StorageBuildingsCanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionCitiesClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsFinance & InvestmentJobsSub-National GovernmentsTransit

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Subscribe to The Energy Mix

    The Energy Mix is your guide to climate change and energy issues and solutions. Whether you’re looking for the latest content on the impacts of climate change, the fossil industries that produce the emissions, renewable energy and energy efficiency alternatives, or climate solutions outside energy, you’ve come to the right place. Please send us your comments and story ideas!

    SEE OUR LATEST DIGEST

    Recent Posts

    AustraliaBrazilCanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementCarbon-Free TransitionChinaClimate Policy/Meetings/NegotiationsEnergy PoliticsEnergy/Carbon Pricing & EconomicsEuropeFinance & InvestmentFirst PeoplesIndiaInternational Agencies & StudiesLegal & RegulatoryMexico, Caribbean & Latin AmericaMiddle EastOil & GasSmall Island StatesSub-National GovernmentsUnited States

    Canada Pledges Net Zero by 2050 as Major Emitters Dig In to Block COP 25 ...

    Canada earned praise for promising to legislate a 2050 deadline for net-zero carbon emissions, but big emitters like Australia, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, India, and China were called out for blocking ...
    • VW

      Enviros Call for Billions in Fines After VW Canada Pleads Guilty to Dieselgate Charges

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Wilkinson Throws Cold Water on Carbon Credits for LNG Exports

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Logging Costs Ontario 650,000 Hectares of Forest, 16.5 Mt of Carbon Storage Over 30 Years

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • New York State Loses Anti-Fraud Case Against ExxonMobil

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Oceans Face Oxygen Loss, Acidification as Warming Challenges Ability to Absorb Carbon

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • 12-Point Agenda Lays Out Possibilities for Global Energy Efficiency Gains

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Battery Costs Plummet 50% in Three Years, 87% Since 2010

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Wildfire

      PG&E, Wildfire Victims Reach $13.5-Billion Settlement

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Rural Municipalities Take the Hit as Alberta Cuts Taxes for Gas Producers

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Canadian Sustainable Beef Standard is ‘Marbled with Loopholes’

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • Crossword Puzzle Tests COP Delegates’ Knowledge on Fossil Fuel Phaseout

      December 11, 2019
       
      Primary Author The Energy Mix staff
      December 11, 2019
    • landfill

      Landfill Methane Would Save 2.5 Gigatons of Emissions by 2050

      December 11, 2019
       
      December 11, 2019
    • U.S., Canadian Fossils to Lead $1.4 Trillion in New Oil and Gas Development Through 2024

      December 9, 2019
       
      December 9, 2019
    • Denmark to Cut Emissions 70% by 2030 While New Zealand Adopts Climate Policy Lens

      Full Story: Climate Home News @ClimateHome

      December 9, 2019
       
      Primary Author Jocelyn Timperley @jloistf
      December 9, 2019

    Partners

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    Copyright 2019 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.