The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

logo

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
Advanced Search
CanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementOil & GasShale & FrackingSub-National Governments
Home›Jurisdictions›Canada›LNG Canada Megaproject Leaves Massive Emissions Gap in B.C. Climate Plan

LNG Canada Megaproject Leaves Massive Emissions Gap in B.C. Climate Plan

January 3, 2019
January 3, 2019
 
239
3
Share:
  •  
  • 69
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    69
    Shares
  Print This Story
BCNDP/flickr

The positive directions in British Columbia’s new climate plan will be offset by the greenhouse gas emissions from the C$40-billion LNG Canada liquefied natural gas megaproject, particularly if both phases of the project are built, data analyst Barry Saxifrage concludes in a post for National Observer.

“The LNG Canada project is massive,” Saxifrage writes. “It will sprawl from new fracked gas wells in northern B.C., across the coast mountains via the hotly-contested, 650-kilometre Coastal GasLink pipeline, to a new liquefaction terminal in Kitimat. From there, the gas will be loaded onto supertankers and shipped to Asia. The LNG terminal is designed to be built in two phases, each of which will produce 13 million tonnes of liquid natural gas. The first phase is now going ahead.”

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

The two phases together would constitute the “biggest capital project in B.C. history,” he adds, and produce up to 10 million tonnes of climate pollution per year, more than all the cars, trucks, and SUVs on the province’s roads today.

“Despite the increase in emissions, the B.C. government says LNG Canada will be compatible with the province’s legislated climate targets,” he writes. But Saxifrage helps clarify the point with a series of charts that show the province’s emissions performance since 2007, the province-wide reductions in the CleanBC plan, and industry emissions in three scenarios—a baseline with no LNG production, a second snapshot with phase one of LNG Canada, and a final one with both phases in operation.

The province ends up with gaps of six megatonnes per year if only the first phase of the project is completed, or 11 megatonnes with both phases. Saxifrage says B.C. has already approved phase 2, leaving it to Royal Dutch Shell and its consortium partners to make the decision based on market conditions.

“Either way, LNG Canada is creating a multi-million-tonne emissions gap that the new CleanBC plan doesn’t have answers for at this point,” Saxifrage states. “The big unanswered question is who in British Columbia will be assigned the burden of making extra cuts to offset LNG Canada’s pollution. The CleanBC plan kicks that can down the road.” But the transportation and buildings sectors “are already tasked with making huge reductions between now and 2030,” and the only other source of emissions to be cut is an industry sector largely dominated by LNG.

The final chart in the series (literally) points an arrow at the rest of the bad news—further emission increases in the event that two more LNG developments, the Woodfibre and Kwispaa projects, win provincial approval. “If these also get approved, B.C.’s Industry sector emissions could jump by another 50%,” he writes.

As for the market conditions Saxifrage refers to, a subsidiary of Malaysian state fossil Petronas, which holds a 25% share of LNG Canada, cut back its natural gas exploration program just before the December holiday, with Petronas Energy Canada CEO Mark Fitzgerald blaming limited pipeline capacity.

“We talk a lot about oil infrastructure,” he told The Canadian Press. “Gas is trapped, as well, and if you compare the prices that Canadian gas producers are receiving against our U.S. peers, the differentials are significant and costing us a significant amount of money.”

The LNG Canada plant in Prince Rupert would be expected to begin shipping gas in late 2023 or early 2024.

TagsCities - Decarbonize
Share:
  •  
  • 69
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    69
    Shares
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
CanadaCarbon Levels & MeasurementOil & GasShale & FrackingSub-National Governments

    3 comments

    1. Jordan 3 January, 2019 at 17:29 Reply

      Where’s the charts?

      • Mitchell Beer 6 January, 2019 at 22:05 Reply

        Just click through to the original source material for our story! The link is at the top of the page.

    2. Chris O'Brien 4 January, 2019 at 20:38 Reply

      Is it my imagination, or is this gas situation in BC an exact parallel to the oil situation in Alberta? Seems to me the height of hypocrisy for BC to block Alberta’s pipeline while BC makes its own plans to ship its gas to offshore markets, perhaps exactly the same markets as Alberta wants to ship its oil to. And on the emissions side, another part of the parallel with Alberta is that BC wants to increase its gas production seemingly indefinitely to feed the Coastal GasLink pipeline, just like Alberta wants to expand its tar sands production with no end in sight.

      By the way, whatever happened to the idea of a global carbon budget that would tell us exactly how much more oil and gas we will be allowed to produce before the taps are turned off? I seem to remember that around 80% of Alberta’s remaining tar sands oil would have to remain in the ground, and I’m sure the same approach has been applied to how much of BC’s gas should remain in the ground. Both figures would translate directly into how many more barrels of oil and cubic metres of gas can be produced and then that’s it — shut ’em down! But no level of government, no industry people, and not even any ENGOs are talking about a carbon budget anymore. It’s all just open-ended musing about when fossil fuels will finally be phased out, and it allows government’s to continue promising everything to everyone — yes, we can have pipelines and get our products to market, and yes we can meet our emissions targets. I don’t believe any of it, but they’re getting away with it because nobody’s holding them to hard numbers, e.g. Alberta, you have X more barrels that you can produce before you’ve used your share of the carbon budget, and then turn the bloody tap off!

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts

    • ‘Humiliated’ Kenney Demands Trade Sanctions, Could Sell Pipeline for Scrap as TC Shuts Down Keystone Construction
      ‘Humiliated’ Kenney Demands Trade Sanctions, Could Sell Pipeline for Scrap as TC Shuts Down Keystone Construction
      January 22, 2021
    • Flurry of Biden Executive Orders Returns U.S. to Paris Agreement, Begins Reversing Trump Deregulatory Agenda
      Flurry of Biden Executive Orders Returns U.S. to Paris Agreement, Begins Reversing Trump Deregulatory Agenda
      January 22, 2021
    • Global Energy Transition Investment Grows 9% in 2020, Hits Record $501 Billion Despite Pandemic
      Global Energy Transition Investment Grows 9% in 2020, Hits Record $501 Billion Despite Pandemic
      January 22, 2021
    • U.S. Chamber of Commerce Embraces Carbon Taxes, Market-Based Climate Policies
      U.S. Chamber of Commerce Embraces Carbon Taxes, Market-Based Climate Policies
      January 22, 2021
    • Power Corp. Division Says $1-Billion Renewables Fund Will Be ‘First of Several’
      Power Corp. Division Says $1-Billion Renewables Fund Will Be ‘First of Several’
      January 22, 2021

    News Feed

    Top News

    • Fitch Sees Asian Solar, Wind Exceeding 1,500 GW by 2029
      January 21, 2021
    • Survey Shows Oklahoma, Texas Drawing More Fossil Investment than Alberta
      January 21, 2021

    Read More

    Carbon-Free Transition

    • Fitch Sees Asian Solar, Wind Exceeding 1,500 GW by 2029
      January 21, 2021
    • Indigenous Agroforesters Revive Palm Forests in Brazil
      January 21, 2021

    Read More

    Canada

    • Hydrogen Train Deal Brings Investor Attention to B.C-Based Ballard
      January 21, 2021
    • Analysts Tout Intertie Between Site C in B.C., Electricity Demand in Alberta
      January 21, 2021

    Read More

    U.S.

    • Climate Change Drives Up Cost of U.S. Flooding
      January 21, 2021
    • ‘Charging Deserts’ for EVs Create Racial Divide in Chicago
      January 21, 2021

    Read More

    International

    • Norway Projects Oil Production Cuts through 2023
      January 21, 2021
    • Japanese Owner Writes Off Australia’s Newest Coal Plant as Worthless
      January 21, 2021

    Read More

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Copyright
    Copyright 2020 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.