The Energy Mix

Top Menu

  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact

Main Menu

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • About
  • Latest Digest/Archive
  • Partners
  • Which Energy Mix is this?
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

logo

  • News Archive by Category
    • Climate & Society
      • Carbon Levels & Measurement
      • Carbon-Free Transition
      • Climate Action/”Blockadia”
      • Climate Denial & Greenwashing
      • Climate Policy/Meetings/Negotiations
      • Culture, Curiosities, & Humour
      • Demographics
      • Energy Politics
      • Energy Subsidies
      • Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
      • Finance & Investment
      • First Peoples
      • Insurance & Liability
      • International Agencies & Studies
      • Jobs & Training
      • Legal & Regulatory
      • Media, Messaging, & Public Opinion
      • Methane
      • Travel, Leisure & Recreation
    • Climate Impacts & Adaptation
      • Biodiversity & Habitat
      • Drought, Famine & Wildfires
      • Food Security
      • Forests & Deforestation
      • Health & Safety
      • Heat & Temperature
      • Human Rights & Migration
      • Ice Loss & Sea Level Rise
      • International Security & War
      • Severe Storms & Flooding
      • Soil & Natural Sequestration
      • Water
    • Demand & Distribution
      • Air & Marine
      • Auto & Alternative Vehicles
      • Batteries/Storage
      • Buildings
      • Cities
      • Electricity Grid
      • Energy Access & Equity
      • Off-Grid
      • Petrochemicals & Plastics
      • Supply Chains & Consumption
      • Transit
      • Walking & Biking
    • Jurisdictions
      • Africa
      • Arctic & Antarctica
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Brazil
      • Canada
      • China
      • Europe
      • India
      • International
      • Mexico, Caribbean & Latin America
      • Middle East
      • Oceans
      • Small Island States
      • South & Central America
      • Sub-National Governments
      • United States
    • Non-Renewable Energy
      • CCS & Negative Emissions
      • Coal
      • Nuclear
      • Oil & Gas
      • Pipelines/Rail Transport
      • Shale & Fracking
      • Tar Sands/Oil Sands
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Renewable Energy
      • Bioenergy
      • Demand & Efficiency
      • General Renewables
      • Geothermal
      • Hydrogen
      • Hydropower
      • Research & Development
      • Solar
      • Wave & Tidal
      • Wind
  • Special Reports
    • Alberta’s Bitumen Pipe Dream
    • Canada’s Drive to Net Zero
    • Carbon Farming
    • City and Sub-National Action
    • Drawdown
    • Drive to 1.5
    • 26-Week Climate Transition Program for Canada
    • America’s Electoral Climate 2020
    • Canada’s Climate Change Election 2019
    • The Energy Mix Yearbook 2018
      • Climate Extremes
      • Fossils Go For Broke
      • Renewables (R)Evolution
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Canada’s Contradiction
      • COP24
      • Pipeline Politics
      • Jobs and Just Transition
      • Cities and Sub-Nationals
      • Finance and Divestment
      • Climate Litigation
  • Webinars & Podcasts
Advanced Search
Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics
Home›Climate & Society›Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics›Fossil Fuel Subsidies Hit (At Least) $373 Billion in 2015, OECD Reports

Fossil Fuel Subsidies Hit (At Least) $373 Billion in 2015, OECD Reports

March 4, 2018
March 4, 2018
 
578
4
Share:
  •  
  • 47
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    47
    Shares
  Print This Story
Department of Energy/Flickr

Countries burned through at least US$373 to $473 billion in fossil fuel subsidies in 2015, according to a report from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that for the first time combines its own data with measures from the International Energy Agency (IEA).

“The report shows support in 76 countries dropped significantly in 2015 compared to 2014, when it sat at $551 billion,” Carbon Brief reports. “However, the estimates do not cover all fossil fuel subsidies, therefore are likely to still be a substantial underestimate of global fossil fuel subsidies.”

Like this story? Subscribe to The Energy Mix and never miss an edition of our free e-digest.

SUBSCRIBE

The merged data set includes subsidies to coal, oil, and natural gas products, but not to electricity produced from fossil fuels—which the IEA estimated at $100 billion for 2015. That would bring the global total for the year closer to $500 billion.

The OECD calculation also excludes indirect measures like credit supports that allow fossil companies to borrow money at lower interest rates. “Government credit assistance can confer substantial benefits to carbon-intensive infrastructure, thus hampering the transition towards a low-carbon world, while inducing revenue losses for governments,” the report noted. “Quantifying the support element of such measures therefore enhances transparency on the use of public resources.”

The report added that “phasing out fossil fuel support is beneficial both through addressing climate policy objectives and raising public revenues,” writes Carbon Brief correspondent Jocelyn Timperley. It calls for greater consistency across agencies’ estimates for fossil subsidies, “especially as inconsistencies in definitions and data are sometimes used as an excuse to postpone action. Greater coordination efforts could also help move towards a consensus on key concepts, such as the conditions under which support to fossil fuel is not considered as ‘inefficient’.”

That adjective matters, Timperley notes, since both the G7 and the G20 have agreed to eliminate “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies,” but have not agreed on a common definition for the term. To help address that problem, the G20 encouraged its members to participate in voluntary peer reviews of their approaches to inefficient subsidies. The United States, China, Germany, and Mexico have completed reviews so far.

“They came up with peer review as a way to circumvent the disagreement on definitions, because with peer review you can define it the way you want,” explained International Institute for Sustainable Development researcher Ivetta Gerasimchuk. “You can define the scope the way you want, you control the process. So it’s not top down. It’s kind of more peer-to-peer, less scary. And now that several countries have done it, it’s been less and less scary.”

In 2015, using a different methodology from the OECD’s, the International Monetary Fund calculated global fossil subsidies at $5.3 trillion per year, or more than $10 million per minute.

Share:
  •  
  • 47
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    47
    Shares
  Print This Story

Find more stories about
Energy/Carbon Pricing & Economics

    4 comments

    1. Peter 8 March, 2018 at 04:13 Reply

      So is it $500b or $5.3t? Quite a difference.

      • Mitchell Beer 9 March, 2018 at 00:56 Reply

        Good question. It depends on methodologies, assumptions, definitions…so from what I’ve understood, they’re both right. But either way, that’s a big thumb on the scale when we need renewables, efficiency, and storage to compete even faster, more widely, and more effectively to keep more fossil resources in the ground.

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    Recent Posts

    • BREAKING: Powering Past Coal Alliance Urges Faster Phaseout While Co-Founders Allow New Coal Mines
      BREAKING: Powering Past Coal Alliance Urges Faster Phaseout While Co-Founders Allow New Coal Mines
      March 3, 2021
    • Windsor, Ontario Courts Investor for $2-Billion Battery Manufacturing Plant
      Windsor, Ontario Courts Investor for $2-Billion Battery Manufacturing Plant
      March 3, 2021
    • Seven in 10 Canadian Car Shoppers Plan to Go Electric
      Seven in 10 Canadian Car Shoppers Plan to Go Electric
      March 3, 2021
    • Fracked U.S. Gas the Main Culprit as Toronto GHG Emissions Rise 7% in 2018
      Fracked U.S. Gas the Main Culprit as Toronto GHG Emissions Rise 7% in 2018
      March 3, 2021
    • Canadian Environmental Justice Bill Set for Commons Debate [Petition]
      Canadian Environmental Justice Bill Set for Commons Debate [Petition]
      March 3, 2021

    News Feed

    Top News

    • Ex-Solar Researcher Named CEO of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board
      March 2, 2021
    • Oil by Rail Rises on Keystone XL Cancellation
      March 2, 2021

    Read More

    Carbon-Free Transition

    • Iraq Plans 750 MW of New Solar Capacity
      March 2, 2021
    • Iberdola Puts More than €1 Billion into Spain’s First ‘Industrial-Scale’ Offshore Wind Farm
      March 2, 2021

    Read More

    Canada

    • Ex-Solar Researcher Named CEO of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board
      March 2, 2021
    • The Tyee’s Nikiforuk Scorches ‘Pharoah’ Horgan’s $16-Billion Hydropower Monument
      March 2, 2021

    Read More

    U.S.

    • Puerto Rico Looks for 1 GW Renewables, 500 MW Storage
      March 2, 2021
    • Appeals Court Refuses to Hear Landmark Youth Climate Case
      March 2, 2021

    Read More

    International

    • German Economic Ministry Sees Departure from Gas Heat Starting Soon
      March 2, 2021
    • East German Union, Grid Operator Launch Plan for Climate-Friendly Industry
      March 2, 2021

    Read More

    • About the Energy Mix
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Copyright
    Copyright 2020 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.